A library database is a digital collection of information, articles, and resources curated by experts.
Unlike a general search engine like Google, library databases focus on providing high-quality, credible sources.
These sources often include:
Here's why library databases are the best choice for in-depth research:
For a full list of all the Databases the Library subscribes to, please access the A-Z Database list from the Library homepage.
You can sort the A-Z Database list by subject by selecting the "All Subjects" dropdown menu from the top of the page and selecting a subject from the list. Once you sort the list by subject, your "best bets" for databases within that subject will be listed at the top in a highlighted box.
Here's a list of the most popular databases for finding articles:
Gale Opposing Viewpoints is a library database that provides access to a wide range of articles and perspectives on current social and political issues, presenting both "pro" and "con" viewpoints on popular topics.
Gale Opposing Viewpoints searches a variety of sources, including:
You can also use this database for research topic development.
When reading viewpoint essays in Gale Opposing Viewpoints, recognize that the authors are trying to persuade the reader to agree with their views.
Keep in mind that these essays are opinion pieces. They are not peer-reviewed journal articles.
It's up to you to analyze the author's credentials to determine if it's a source worthy of citing in your own work.
EXAMPLE:
Take for example the following viewpoint essay - "Global Warming Will Not Increase Food Insecurity," by Patrick J. Michaels. We see in the article commentary that Michaels is a "global warming skeptic," which informs the reader that this essay will be heavily biased.
We also see that Michaels worked for the Cato Institute. A quick Google Search of the Cato Institute shows that this institution is affiliated with right-libertarianism values, which demonstrates political bias. The Cato Institute was also founded by Charles Koch, a billionaire aligned with conservative politics who's businesses have proven to violate environmental protections. The institutional affiliations of Michaels further prove why his viewpoint is biased.