Skip to Main Content

Mathematics & Statistics: Types of Sources

Primary v Secondary

Primary versus Secondary Research Scientific Research is conducted and submitted for publication  Primary source Published peer-reviewed articles Structured format may include: Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion Cited references Literature cited Which is Reported in the news or Literature review Secondary source Newspapers Magazines Published articles – review article New York Times logo USA Today logo Time Magazine cover thumbnail

Primary v Secondary Sources

Primary Sources

 

Some definitions:

  • Original materials on which other research is based.

  • Usually the first formal appearance of results in the print or electronic literature.

  • Present information in its original form, neither interpreted nor condensed nor evaluated by other writers.

  • Are from the time period (for example, something written close to when what it is recording happened is likely to be a primary source.)

  • Present original thinking, report on discoveries, or share new information.

Some examples:

  • Scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results

  • Proceedings of Meetings, Conferences and Symposia.

  • Technical reports

  • Dissertations or theses (may also be secondary)

  • Internet communications on email, listservs, and newsgroups

Secondary Sources

In science, secondary sources are those which simplify the process of finding and evaluating the primary literature. They tend to be works which repackage, reorganize, reinterpret, summarise, index or otherwise "add value" to the new information reported in the primary literature.

Some Definitions:

  • Describe, interpret, analyze and evaluate the primary sources.

  • Comment on and discuss the evidence provided by primary sources.

  • Are works which are one or more steps removed from the event or information they refer to, being written after the fact with the benefit of hindsight.

Some examples:

  • Dictionaries and encyclopedias

  • Handbooks and data compilations

  • Journal articles, particularly in disciplines other than science (may also be primary)

  • Monographs (other than fiction and autobiography)

  • Newspaper and popular magazine articles (may also be primary)

  • Review articles and literature reviews

  • Textbooks

Primary, Secondary & Tertiary Sources
Written by Ward Saylor & Helen Hooper for Information and Research Support, within the Information Services program of the Academic Support Division at James Cook University, July, 2000. 

Popular v Scholarly

Popular vs. Scholarly Literature “Scholarly and “popular” are terms used to describe a source’s content, purpose, audience and more.  Popular sources are useful for getting ideas for a topic or for background and anecdotal information. Typically, however, you should support your arguments by citing scholarly articles, which contain original research written by experts. Popular: General interest stories and opinion pieces Easily understood language Not peer-reviewed Rarely give bibliographic citations Not structured format Examples include time Magazine, Discover, U. S. News, the Boston Globe, the New York times, USA Today. Secondary sources usually fall into this category. Scholarly: Original research and inquiry Scholarly or technical language Often peer-reviewed Includes full citations for sources Structured format Examples include Blood, American Journal of Psychology, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, and the Journal of Finance. Primary sources usually fall into this category.

Peer-Review Process

Peer Review Process This is a continuing cycle. Author writes article and submits to journal. Editor sends copy to peers (experts in the field) for reviewing.  This is usually a blind process.  The peer reviewers check the manuscript for accuracy and assess the validity of the research methodology and procedures.  Their goal is to find any gaps in reasoning and to ensure nothing has been overlooked. The article is returned to the editor along with recommendations to either reject, revise, or accept it. The editor sends the article back to the author along with the reviewers’ feedback and requests for revisions.  After the article is revised it will have to be resubmitted for publication. Paper accepted and published, then usually listed in databases for other researchers to find and read, to inform their writing.  Back to Author writes article and submits to journal.  The cycle continues.